the weekly feature

It has been a while since we have updated the page, and I apologize for the absence. We will be updating the weekly feature very soon. Thank you for continuing to stop by, and we promise to have some cool new “stuff” for you soon.

- ecoshare staff

Sara Seumae at The Seattle Green Festival

Home – Trailer

If you haven’t seen this movie, please take the time to watch.  It will change your perspective…I promise.

more about “Home – Trailer“, posted with vodpod

Macro vs. Micro – Changing the Way We Look at the Grid

The argument for alternative energy is as pervasive as it is polarizing.  There are those that are adamant that we can keep going along at the status quo and everything will be fine (thankfully their numbers are decreasing rapidly), and there are those that believe that we need to go completely off the grid and live like the caveman (luckily that isn’t the prevailing attitude either).  Most of us however, fall into the middle, as with most things, but that middle ground is wide and murky with all shades of grey represented.

Currently the move toward energy sustainability in the US is slow and plodding, with large utility companies trying to apply old business processes to an entirely new problem.  Huge solar and wind farms in remote locations providing large amounts of power to entire cities, transmitted through an archaic system of overhead power lines and underground pipelines.  This means of transferring energy is inherently flawed and wastes not only energy but massive amounts of resources.  From the standpoint of the large utility companies this makes sense, centralize the power production, distribute it to the people who need it, ensure a consistent product, and make a tidy profit.  But is this the best model going forward?

In a society where power is derived from burning coal and other fossil fuels, and from large hydroelectric turbines, it makes absolute sense to have a large scale operation.  I personally don’t have room for a coal plant in my backyard, and neither does anyone else.  The problem however arises when we start talking about readily available natural resources that are accessible by everyone, most notably wind and sun.  Does it make sense to have a central power distributer that has uses the same sunshine and wind that you and I feel everyday?  Why should we be paying the utility companies to give us power that they generated from the same sun that shines on my house as their solar farm?

T. Boone Pickens is one of the smartest business men in the world; he has made billions of dollars by making smart and tactical business decisions.  Recently he scrapped his idea of building the worlds largest wind farm, not because wind power wasn’t a viable energy resource, but rather because the business model didn’t make sense. “The problem lies in the difficulty of getting 4,000 megawatts of power from Texas to the power distribution system…”  Exactly.

So if a macro-grid isn’t the answer what is?  The logical step would be to look micro.  As stated earlier, you and I have the same sun shining on our houses as the massive solar farms do.  Wind doesn’t lose its effective power just because it turns a turbine 20 miles out in the ocean; it still blows right on by my house and yours.  Taking responsibility for our own energy demands and using what we are able harness personally seems to be a much more cost effective option, not only from a personal standpoint, but also from the perspective of the resources required to develop and maintain such large power plants.

A solar panel system of 10 3’x5’ panels on the roof of a residential home can more than account for the required energy to operate a home, even with 6 plasma TV’s 3 computers, and a hybrid in the garage.  So again, why should we pay a multinational conglomerate to provide us with energy that we can, with a small investment, produce ourselves?  Other than installation, and some maintenance (both of which can be done by the supplier) there isn’t a great deal of work that goes into procuring the energy.  Additionally a commercial meter can be purchased that, unlike a flat rate residential meter, can monitor the varying power usage of the grid, and bank power to be sold back at peak usage times, effectively decreasing your investment cost by maximizing the value of the excess energy your system produces.

Likewise a wind turbine can deliver anywhere from 1- 10 kilowatts, depending on the model, size, and amount of wind in your area, which can account for up to30-90% of the average home’s energy requirements, dropping monthly utility bills to an estimated $8-$15 per month.  In addition to the installation of solar panels and wind turbines, an effective means of safeguarding against interruptions in service is the installation of a battery back-up system, some of which can store enough power to run an average house for up to a week.

The argument has been, and will continue to be made that a micro-grid system offers no protection against system malfunctions, or natural disasters, thus it is an ineffective means of consistent reliable power.  Believe it or not I wholeheartedly agree with this sentiment.  Even with a battery back-up system in place, power outages and shortages are inevitable.  One of the feathers in the utility companies’ collective hat is that they deliver a necessary service, in a very reliable and consistent manner.  It would be irresponsible to think that a large scale grid should be done away with entirely.  However the macro-grid should be used as a back up, and storage mechanism for times when the micro-grid fails, or becomes overloaded.

One of the themes of ecoshare is that the small things matter.  A combination of both solar and wind power sources, along with a concerted effort to reduce energy consumption, and decrease our carbon footprint can reduce our dependence on fossil fuel power immensely.  But this is not an either/or scenario, we will always (or at least for the foreseeable future) need a macro-grid to power large scale operations, protect against unpredictable conditions and serve as a back up when we simply cannot generate enough energy to meet our personal demands.  Part of living sustainably is coming to compromises, and utilizing all of our resources to most effectively live in harmony with our environment.  Unfortunately this idea has not permeated the top levels of many of our energy providers.  The idea that there is only a single bottom line (rather than 3), and that shareholders must see increased returns will continue to drive the outdated business model until a shift in thinking is made.  As the sustainable residential energy market continues to grow, it will eat into profits and thus it quickly becomes evident why the utility companies are fighting the idea of a micro-grid at every turn.

golf and the environment

As a golfer I love being on the course.  The vast expanse of well manicured green, fresh air, and overwhelming quiet, are things I rarely get to experience living in an urban environment.  It is one thing that I enjoy waking up before 7 am for.  It is my chance to get away from the cell phone, the email, and all the other daily stress that comes along with being an adult.  Golf is 4 hours of my life that I focus on something that gives me complete pleasure, no matter how well or poor I play.  The feeling of nothingness as the perfect shot is struck and lands exactly where my minds eye envisioned, is like no other that I experience.  Golf is a passion.  Unfortunately that passion comes at a price, and not just one related to the size of my bank account.  The price is paid by the earth.

Golf, started in an open field with rocks and sticks, a game played by farmers and herders in their spare time, has now grown into a multinational, multibillion dollar sports industry.  We have stars, and legends, we have icons and monuments.  All of these things based around hitting a small round ball into a slightly larger hole approximately a quarter mile away.  If you golf, you understand just how important it is to be in the fairway, and how much different a shot can be if in the rough by just a few feet.  You also appreciate a perfectly manicured green with nice even speed all over, and how an unrepaired ball mark or stray pine needle can alter a putt significantly.  Golf is a game that when played well, on the right course can be put on par (pun intended) with a religious experience.

Urban and suburban sprawl are chewing up land at an unprecedented rate in the US and around the world.  Farms and countryside are being cleared for McMansions and strip malls.  Golf courses however, provide an inherently natural setting for vegetation and wildlife.  They are uniquely positioned to allow humans and animals to coexist in the same setting while providing a safe environment to do so.  On average a golf course ranges anywhere from 110-160 acres in total, including driving range, practice greens, and clubhouse facilities.  The majority of the course acreage is in the rough areas (appx 66%), composed of tall grass, trees, shrubs, and water hazards, all of which are habitats for wildlife.  Birds and small game all find sanctuary in the outlying areas of golf courses, utilizing the thick brush, trees, and marshland as their home.  On more than one occasion however, I have seen wildlife right in the middle of the fairway, as has been the case when trying to shoo away a flock of geese from an approach shot near a water hazard.

Stop for a moment, and think about the work that goes into maintaining a golf course.  The hours of mowing, the gallons of water, the buckets of fertilizer, the bags of mulch, all go into making what basically is a very large field, into a course worthy of the name, Jones, Dye, Palmer, or Nicklaus.  These courses are monumental undertakings that require staffs of people, hundreds of hours per week to keep in pristine condition.  But what sort of impact does that work cause on the planet?

The most obvious resource used by golf courses is water. In the US, there are more than 1.7 million acres of golf courses that use nearly 4 billion gallons of water daily.  There are estimates that put gallons per round, per golfer at anywhere from 2,200 to 5,400.  That means that every time you or I go to the course to play a round, a minimum of 2,200 gallons of water is required to support that round.  2,200 Gallons!  That is equivalent to a 4’ deep 12’ round swimming pool, every round.

Pesticides and fertilizers are also a major issue for golf courses, not only in terms of environmental impact but also from a budget standpoint.  Golf courses can spend upward of $100,000 in fertilizers and pesticides per year.  These chemicals then get washed into the surrounding waterways, increasing algae growth and killing fish and other animals living in and around local waterways.  The Attorney General of New York State suggests that golf courses use 2.7 times more pesticides per acre per year than average farmlands do.

An effective golf course environmental management program can result in reduced insurance premiums, as well as reduced costs for energy, water, pesticides, or fertilizers.  As we stated earlier, water use by golf courses is monumental, so is stands to reason that implementing a water savings plan would be a pretty good place to start.  Using gray water and rain water collection strategies can cut the demand for city water by up to 50%.  Duke University Golf Club at Washington Duke Inn has used these strategies which allow them to irrigate their entire course with only the water from the retention ponds on the course.  The type of grass can also drastically reduce the need for irrigation.  Perennial rye grass requires substantially less water than traditional Bermuda turfgrass.

Have you ever seen pine trees in Arizona?  Bringing in non-native vegetation can have detrimental effects on an ecosystem, whereas native vegetation adds a unique quality to a golf course, and prevents the introduction of new species of plants that may alter the balance of the ecosystem in a certain area.  Likewise using natural vegetation in rough areas and allowing natural hazards to emerge can foster native wildlife habitats.  Out of bounds areas can be set up as sanctuaries for species of plants and animals that may otherwise be displaced by the development of the golf course.

Vegetation and water use are not the only areas where golf course managers can decrease the overall impact of a golf course.  Electric vehicles may not be the majority on the roads these days, but on the golf course they should be the only choice.  Today’s electric golf carts have the power to traverse hilly terrain, and unlike in the past, now have been outfitted with speed limiters for downhill travel.  In predominantly sunny locales the energy requirement can easily be fulfilled with solar power.  Electric vehicles are cheaper to maintain and cheaper to run, this should be a no brainer.

Lastly, a concerted effort to promote recycling and waste reduction should be at the top of every course’s “To Do” list.  Most beverages provided by golf courses are either in cans or plastic bottles, all of which can be easily recycled.  At almost every course there is a trash can at each tee box, the addition of a recycling can would be an easy way for golfers to passively participate in the greening of the course.

As golfers we are positioned to drive change in the industry.  By only patronizing courses that participate in eco-conscious practices we can send a message that courses need to adopt a policy of environmental stewardship.  Talk to the head Pro, or the Greens-keeper and let them know that you appreciate these efforts.  Positive reinforcement can go a long way toward ensuring that course managers continue to maintain their courses in an environmentally sustainable manner.

Every golfer has to take some responsibility for the effort.  If you are offered recycling, use it.  Trash on the golf course should be picked up…even if it isn’t yours.  I was playing a few weeks ago with a friend, and we were paired up with another twosome, two older gentlemen.  They were quite nice, and very good golfers, but one of them was an absolute slob.  I must have picked up 2 packs worth of gum wrappers, and at least 15 cigarette butts throughout the round that he had discarded, in some cases not 10 feet from a trash can.  Remember the golf course is a beautiful place that is home to many thousands of plants and animals that don’t need your trash lying around.

Another alternative to playing on the course every week is to play virtual golf.  There are numerous facilities that provide virtual golf experiences.  These can be played year-round, and allow you to play courses all over the world.  My good Friend Lynni Megginson is installing a High Definition Golf Simulator in the CharityWorks Green House in Washington DC, that allows you to play Pebble Beach, Pinehurst #2, and Doral, to name a few.  Not only can you play courses that you may never have a chance to play live, most places have a dedicated server for food and drinks…no more waiting on the cart girl to come by every 6-8 holes.

I encourage all golfers, young and old, scratch and 25+ handicappers to search out, and patronize those courses that practice sustainability.  The future of the game and the future of the Earth will benefit from these efforts.

jim embry interview

A new interview has been added!  I had the good fortune to speak with Jim Embry of www.SustainLex.org.  He is truly one of the most amazing men I have ever met.  Please take a moment to see what he had to say.  You will not be disappointed, I promise.

IeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIe

ecoshare is featured!

Lynni - Profile picYesterday I was introduced to the wonderfully talented, and extremely passionate Lynni Megginson. Lynni is installing a High Definition Virtual Golf Simulator for the Charity Works Green House. Find out more about her at www.lynnimegginson.com, and check back on ecoshare for more updates. She will be the Daily Feature coming soon.

Learn more about CharityWorks here.

IeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIeIe

Read more »

The Triple Bottom Line

As the economic and environmental climate continues to change, the idea of the triple bottom line is becoming more of a factor in business. Companies that want to position themselves for the future can no longer focus just on profits anymore. So what is the triple bottom line? The TBL or 3BL is a focus on three factors: Ecological impact, Social impact, and Economic impact. Sounds pie in the sky and earthy crunchy right? Well it is, but it is also a very important way to do business, if you want to your company to be relevant in 10 years.

The first tenet of the TBL is Ecologic Impact – how are companies interacting with the environment. This takes into consideration a large number of factors. Energy consumption, waste production, and life cycle of the product itself, are all considerations when talking about ecologic impact. Companies are finding that energy efficiency and waste reduction not only helps the environment, but can actually save money in the long run. See my blog “Toward a More Efficient Economy” which talks about the savings involved in being green. Along with energy efficiency and waste reduction companies are concerned with the lifecycle of the product. Any company wanting to call itself green cannot do so with a clear conscience when their product ends up in a landfill after a single use.

The second leg of the TBL stool is the social impact. Does the company make this world a better place? This is a little harder to gauge, but one should consider a product’s intended use, as well as the “other” things a company participates in, such as charities, and involvement with nonprofits. Does the company take an active roll in the community it is in? Does it provide childcare or afterschool care for worker’s children? Does a company do outreach to disadvantaged populations, or donate money to organizations that have a social impact? These are the things that will help set a company apart from it’s competition.

Lastly profit has to be a consideration. A company must make money in order to continue to focus on the other two factors in the TBL. Not a lot more that needs to be said about that.

Hopefully TBL will be the new black. TBL can and will change the not only the economic landscape, but the environmental landscape as well, and it will change it for the better.

Restructuring Detroit

With the American auto industry in the toilet, jobless rates headed in the wrong direction, and the economy looking a little green around the gills, now may not seem like the greatest time to go out and dump a lot of money into Detroit. But I beg to differ. As our newly elected CIC stated, “America doesn’t make anything, anymore.” That is almost correct, we don’t make anything that doesn’t cost about a third less to make somewhere else. The Ford Motor company recently left it’s plant in Norfolk, VA for greener (and presumably cheaper) pastures in Mexico. The only reason Toyota and Honda are still able to afford to make their vehicles in the US is because they don’t hire UAW workers. The times of a 20 year position in a plant with the big 3, and a phat retirement are over. Eventually the automakers will move plants to countries with cheaper labor, and no retirement or health care requirements, but that does not mean that Detroit has to go the way of the wild west ghost town. No, Detroit will be perfectly suited for a rebirth of sorts, and this one will not be rust colored, but rather a bright shiny Green.

Even if the automakers find a way to stay in Detroit, there are still massive numbers of skilled laborers that will work for a decent wage, and fair treatment, not only in Detroit, but all the way through the northeastern part of the country. There are factories and plants that have sat idle throughout Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and New Jersey waiting for a time like this. So what will save these areas? Green manufacturing. I am not talking about factories that have sustainable business process, and recycle their waste, no, I am talking about manufacturing the actual green components themselves. Wind turbines need the be manufactured somewhere, why not Detroit? Solar panels have to be assembled, why not Scranton, PA? According to recent article by Melanie Warner, 450 new jobs have been created in Pipestone, Minnesota (population 4,095), since a turbine-manufacturing facility and service operation opened in 2007. I can’t imagine rent would be too terribly high, and the workers would welcome an opportunity for a paying job over a measly unemployment check.

As an environmental community we talk about changing the way we think about the environment, but I think we have a tendency to focus on the areas where it is accepted. It is extremely easy to drive a hybrid car in Los Angeles, but have you ever tried to preach the benefits of solar cells in Huntington, WV? Manufacturers have a great opportunity to not only take advantage of an extremely skilled workforce and cheap land, but more importantly there is a virtually untapped market of consumers, that has been ignored for one reason or another. The risk may present itself as too large to undertake in an economic climate such as this, but I am willing to bet that those that do are going to improve all three bottom lines.

For another take on fixing Detroit read “Beyond Detroit” by Charles C. Mann

06/02/09 – Update

Checkout this video about Clipper Windpower to see how they took a 300,000 sq/ft  empty warehouse in Cedar Rapids and added 400+ jobs making wind turbines.

The Bamboo Revolution and the Importance of Sustainable Skating

It is no secret that skateboarding is a huge part of this nation’s culture. From humble beginnings in the 1950’s when surfers were looking for something to do on the days when the waves weren’t there, to the 1970’s and the rise of the Z-boys, to today, skateboarding and the culture it has spawned has grown to a $5B industry. But there is a new movement afoot, and it is toward a more environmentally friendly end.

Traditionally modern skateboards are made from maple hardwood. Maple trees take approximately 60-70 years to mature and deforestation imposes a nasty environmental impact. According to Jason Salfi of Comet Skateboards, skateboard construction accounts for a large majority of the maple trees that are being logged today. However, there are a few companies that have started using the stronger, lighter bamboo in their decks, and have seen amazing results. Arbor, Sector 9, Comet and Bamboo Sk8 are among the leaders in the Bamboo board revolution, and Miatri Clothing has just launched their new board as well.

About Bamboo:
First of all it is technically a “Grass” and not a wood. Bamboos’ incredibly fast growth (up to 4 feet per day) makes it an environmentally sound and sustainable alternative choice for almost anything made from wood. Bamboo doesn’t need to be replanted, because it will grow a new shoot from the existing root structure, unlike trees that, once cut are gone forever. Bamboo also will convert 35% more CO2 than an equal stand of trees. The inherent strength and hardness of bamboo actually makes it a better option for many products, including skateboards.

Regardless of how sustainable or “freen” these boards are, the real test is ridability. If these products aren’t ridable, then there really is no point in buying one. As I stated earlier, bamboo is stronger and lighter than maple, and from my experience, and several other reviews from other riders, these boards are bombproof. They are more responsive and last longer than their maple counterparts. The only drawback that I see right now is price. Because bamboo is the new technology the price is generally 20-30% higher than a conventional board. That being said, the durability of the boards allow them to be ridden longer and harder than a traditional board without breaking.

There is another alternative to consider as well. FlexDex has been producing skateboards made from recycled polycarbonate. Not only are they made from recycled material the boards themselves are 100% recyclable. The trucks, like most are made from recyclable metals like aluminum so in essence the entire board save the wheels maybe recycled. An important point though is that they start with recycled material.

I currently ride a Sector 9 Pipeline longboard, and it is amazing. It is such a smooth ride, and a rock solid board (I am 6′5″ 225lbs), with great response and not too much flex. I encourage anyone who currently skates, or has children who skate to try a bamboo or polycarbonate board. The environmental impact of harvesting bamboo is less and the boards last longer. Please support the companies that are working to make a small difference in our world.